Dear noble Bharatiyas, 

Four pillars of Defence are "Territory, People, Ideology, Indoctrination and LEADERSHIP". Partition greatly reduced territory, led to massacres of innocent people, the flight of millions as refugees, further demoralisation of the humiliated nation, and shamed the armed forces. Further acts of treason were to retain the enemy in Partitioned India and impose bogus secularism in order to “bash” the Hindus, appease the foreigners and destroy the country at a future date.  

By accepting Partition without any mandate from people Jawaharlal Nehru "achieved" what NO invader had achieved in the preceding centuries. He reduced India in size, rendered the defences based on natural geographical barriers, useless, and put the Indian army in a lethal trap.

Earlier, the invaders used to come from beyond the borders. Friend and foe could be recognised easily. But Nehru ensured that the enemy is kept within, too, and the distinction between friend and foe is obliterated. Nehru, the autocrat with no love for ‘Hindu and Hindusthan’, was beyond reproach. 

An Army that obeys any Civil (superior Civil authority) may be committing collective suicide or high treason against the country they are supposed to defend.

The views of the esteemed veterans (below) are about a normal country whereas India is the most abnormal country on earth due to her ("clipped") Military and (corrupt) Civil. 

Pandit JL Nehru became the unchallenged autocratic LEADER ("Fuehrer"), usurping the Divine Right to rule till death. From 1947 till 1964 he ruled supreme, enjoying an iconic status in India. He was BEYOND reproach and whatever he did was "right" even agreeing to the UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER of India without challenge or fight, discarding his Secularism in an instant. 

The day he declared "Independence" and saw his "midnight tryst with destiny" our India had shrunk overnight by one third in territory with millions of refugees pouring in. The Indian Army that was supposed to defend them and our TERRITORY, remained invisible. Nehru's dazzle blinded the nation to the reality with regard to his disloyalty to genuine Secularism and India. He was expected to stick to United India, echoing Churchill’s famous words, “We shall fight the enemy on the beaches, on land, on sea and in the air!”. 

The nation went on adoring Nehru, the Army went on obeying him, media went on building his “super human” image, and NO one questioned, "WHY PARTITION?"

Those fateful talks between All-INDIA Muslim League and All-INDIA Congress Party, had NO Hindu participant. Self- negating, demoralised, "pulverised" and leaderless Hindus did not demand a seat at the Independence talks, nor voice for themselves! 

Exploiting the Hindus' weakness further, Nehru conveniently forgot about “transfer of population.”  Bapu Gandhi did further damage by calling the Army "evil men of violence." Both men tried to demoralise the Jawans and the generals alike. 

We Indians have no tradition of INVESTIGATIVE journalism and no habit of QUESTIONING our rulers and their motives and conduct. For a thousand years, to do so, was to invite death. Thus Nehru escaped scrutiny into his innermost ideological motivation. One can (and ought to) see that he was the friend of Pakistan (Islam) and an enemy of India (Hindus). He was NOT suitable for the post of Prime Minister. The worst is that he looked at the Hindus through the eyes of the Imperial British and had CONTEMPT for the natives but admiration for the foreigners.  

In that tradition his daughter married a Muslim who changed his surname from “Khan” to "Gandhi" while she took the name of "Maimuna Begum" at "nikah". His grandson Rajiv imported a nondescript semiliterate, impoverished Roman Catholic Italian girl who came to live in the Prime Minister's house without prior security vetting. Today she enjoys a higher status as the de facto “First Lady” of India than the Prime Minister and the Supreme Commander. Our subdued slave nation will watch our brave Jawans give the 'general salute' to the next prospective Prime Minister Rahul Gandhi with a Venezuelan wife on his side. We have forgotten that an Army is also to defend the dignity of native women besides our native soil (territory). 

Nehru's high treason in surrendering Lahore and four other provincial capitals to Islam while IMPOSING his secularism on the rest of us (Hindus and Sikhs) was deliberate and premeditated mischief. He not only FAILED to call upon the Army to confront the enemy in the hour of India's peril but also silenced MK Gandhi's feeble and lone cry of "Akhand Bharat Amar Rahe!" that was on our lips in those days. 

That true and patriotic Ideal was seen neither in Nehru's speeches nor in his Constitution. And it is also not on the lips of the MP's ("rats") sitting in India's Parliament today. How was it possible to dump nationalism, patriotism, Idealism and SECUALRISM so quickly? Traitor Nehru had a great hold on the people of India and their brains. 

For the Army to obey such an evil man who had betrayed the country so quickly was comparable to the German generals blindly obeying Hitler. The Army had to SHOOT the traitor dead before he did more damage to the country. Indeed, Nehru escaped the wrath of patriots and the trial for treason. A lot of damage has been done to India, not just the BILLIONS OF DOLLARS illegally deposited in Italian, British and American banks while India needed good roads, clean water, clean administration, well stocked schools, better universities and efficient hospitals. 

Nehru, the charming barrister, was not naive or innocent. He was an 'anti India' crook to the core. He focused on two potential threats to his own life: The ARMY and the SIKHS (those who carry the "kirpan" to defend "Dharti”). Partition hit the Sikhs the hardest with the loss of lands, homes, farms, shops and holy places, including the Janmasthan of Guru Nanak Dev, the historic shrine in Panja Sahib, and the centre of their culture, Lahore. The malicious attack on Golden Temple in Amritsar was launched in June 1984 on the occasion of a major religious festival (held to commemorate the martyrdom of Guru Arjun Dev when tens of thousands of pilgrims gather there) in order to cause maximum deaths. Dead bodies were simply put on trucks and driven away for mass cremation. The British at Jallianwala Bagh in 1919 had at least returned the dead with respect to the bereaved families. The widespread State sponsored massacres of thousands of the law abiding and loyal Sikhs across northern India after Maimuna Begun’s assassination on October 31, 1984, showed the evil side of the rulers. 26 years on, the Sikhs have yet to see a criminal hanged to death or jailed. The army’s role in Operation Blue Star was despicable. Hundreds of gallant Sikh troops left their posts in protest at this extreme provocation by their uncaring, corrupt and despotic rulers. An ignorant and subservient nation failed to assess the lasting hurt to the Sikhs who are integral part of the mainstream, not a treacherous “second” nation within India. 

East Bengal was surrendered to Islam promptly in 1947 and returned to the enemy again (unconditionally) in 1972 but East Punjab had to be treated very differently. One cannot have TWO standards in Civil while the Military must have only ONE. 

Alienating the Sikhs, the traditional defenders of Hindusthan was the ideal choice of evil Maimuna Begum (Indira) to give an ally to the Kashmiri separatists.  What rotten advisers and generals did our Bharat have! 

The Bofors "Chor" (Rajiv) had to be tried for taking illegal commissions before they put an army general on trial for corruption. No General is honourable that blindly obeys a treacherous and corrupt Civil (superiors). 

We believe the Army generals have been correct to ensure secularism and honesty among the ranks but at the same time cowards fp

or taking orders from the corrupt, incompetent and rotten civilians at all levels. The implications of this imbalance are coming to the fore. 

India under Subhash Chandra Bose would have been very different. Nehru betrayed India and ignored the Indian Army like a third class useless appendage to the administration. He cut our pay and allowances radically, and stopped buying the latest state of the art weaponry, the result of which was the humiliating defeat and rout in North East and Aksai Chin in 1962. 

His daughter vindictively gave a "bloody nose" to the hard working, brave and honorable Sikhs while his grandson Rajiv sent an expeditionary force to kill the Tamils of Indian origin in Sri Lanka. Both did not "lift a finger" to recover North Kashmir, delete Article 370 in Constitution or stop the Hajj subsidies for the Muslims travelling to Mecca. 

It appears that Nehru was bent upon denying the thrill of victory in battlefield to our Jawans. Earlier, he had stopped our own advancing army in Kashmir, causing great anger and frustration among the ranks. It was in Nehru's personal interest to do so. He had to divert all the nation's attention to Kashmir, overlooking the "TEN KASHMIRS" he had surrendered to the enemy so readily in 1947!  

The word "Partition" was dropped by Nehru and Partitioned India emerged as "India", BROKEN Bharat became "Bharat" and the badly fragmented, much reduced, East Punjab became "Punjab" once again. There is no example of such BRAINWSHING, FOOLING and slavish submission of an entire nation in history. 

Kashmir "DISPUPTE" suited Nehru ideally and we still have it. For Kashmir's eventual surrender it was necessary to maintain her Muslim MAJORITY. So we have Article 370 in Constitution. No Indian civilian or Jawan can buy land or house there. Despite public outcry this separatist and discriminatory Article is still there. We expected a General to speak up for his Jawans' right to buy land in a State that they are defending with lives. This Article is like a "dagger" stuck in India's Lok Sabha that has now become "Sonia Sabha". 

As a thief fears the police, Nehru feared the army. As a traitor fears the patriot, Nehru feared the Sikhs. His successors, being his own dynasty and in his own image, have continued his policies & politics faithfully. That explains their attitude towards the Army.  

Wars and battles have finished in bogus" cease fires"- not outright victories. Army has been misused more than once. Unlike the Turks' intervention in Cyprus, the Indian soldiers went as Rajiv Gandhi’s mercenaries to Sri Lanka to suppress and kill the Tamils of INDIAN origin there. The army was misused against our own citizens in East Punjab in June 1984. The Jawans were also betrayed in 1972 when EAST Bengal was returned to the ENEMY even after its capture at great cost to the army!  

Nehru's daughter did not commend her Secularism to Shaikh Mujiburrahman! At that time Pakistan was broken and defeated. We had her army in captivity. Yet our Army was not ordered to recover North Kashmir! Only a prime minister who loved the enemy more than her own country could so easily let that opportunity, to recover our own territory, pass. 

The victory in Kargil is not celebrated by the Supreme Commander who is busy receiving the gallantry medals from the embittered ex servicemen. Neither the Prime Minister nor the Supreme Commander attended the funeral of the only Field Marshal India had, Maneckshaw. 

Because of the self-seeking, corrupt and treacherous CIVIL (wing), fearful of the Army take-over (just as a thief fears his arrest any moment!), not only the MILITARY but the country, too, is being misled towards DOOM while we are watching the political, social, communal and moral chaos going apace in our Partitioned Indian Secular Sate. 

There will be NO joy for the Indian Army until we have a new Constitution that acknowledges (or explains) "Partition" and insists on one law for all without any Italian input. 

Many times in the past the treacherous rulers are known to have sent their own armies deliberately to defeat and destruction, fearing their own overthrow. Such a scenario is most likely to take place in our Bharat where the rulers are corrupt and criminals and the nation weak, confused and compliant.