HT News Service	Why Minority Sub quota was a bad idea - Agree ?
Blog	Posted By: hindtodaynews on:5/29/2012 4:00:57 AM

You might have read Andhra Pradesh High Court scolded Central Government, after hearing their casual argument on 4.5 per cent sub-quota to minorities carved out of 27 per cent OBC reservation.

This reservation was designated as "heterogeneous" and found to be based on pure religious grounds; hence "unconstitutional".
 
Hon'able High Court concluded  that - Office Memorandum(OM) creating the sub-quota was based on religious grounds and not on any other consideration.

In public terms - it was minority appeasement.
Muslim minorities must have the first claim on resources -Manmohan Singh

The main motive was the policy of Muslim appeasement - Congress wanted 9 % reservation for Muslims and  Mulayam Singh wanted 18% reservation for Muslims.

Had there been no 50% Max limit on Reservations, Congress party  and Mulayam Singh Yadav would  have promised 75% quota for Muslims.

Muslims are backward because they follow the rules of Quaran which are dated back to 600AD. Most Shariah law practices are dated back to 600AD - covering face and not educating girl children are some examples.

The December 22, 2011 OM for a sub quota of 4.5 per cent for socially and educationally backward classes of citizens belonging to minority communities out of the 27 per cent reservation for OBCs in central educational institutions and jobs was announced by the Centre ahead of the Assembly elections in five states including Uttar Pradesh and Punjab.
In both places they lost.


AP High Court inferred that - "No evidence has been shown  by the learned Assistant Solicitor General to justify the classification of these religious minorities as a homogeneous group or as more backward classes deserving some special treatment.Therefore, they inferred that Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Zoroastrians (Parsis) do not form a homogeneous group but a heterogeneous group.

Now - what ?

Salman Khursid says Center will go to Supreme Court.

Why Religious based reservation is wrong ?

As such Reservation should stop after a generation. While it is social justice for some - it is injustice for  talented individuals, who missed a better career just because of their caste.

Also, in Indian subcontinent, Muslims ruled more than 1000 years. Still they are backward. The prime reason is Shariah law which is incompatible with modern civil right laws. Polygamy is banned in USA but in India - that is legal. More uneducated wives, more children = "backwardness". A small family of 4 (1 educated wife, 2 kids ) with a decent pay of 25000 per month = "prosperity"

This is not some historical wrong done to SC/ST or OBCs by Brahmans. Muslims were never an oppressed community. They just feel that going backward  towards 600AD is a good religious decision. So, why would others suffer and sacrifice for a community with a backward outlook ?

When comes to vote - Muslims do smart voting as a group. So, there is a race among politicians to grab Muslim vote by appeasing them with unconstitutional reservations.